Home
Local Affiliates and Meetups
Other Organizations
Who’s Who?
Recommended Reading
Public Forum
Libertarian Party of Massachusetts
| What A Great Time It Is To Be A Libertarian! |
 Are You a Libertarian? Take the Quiz! |
The Libertarian Party of Massachusetts, a member of The National Libertarian Party, the only political party dedicated to both economic and personal freedoms. We are dedicated to the support of the complete bill of rights, the restoration of limited, constitutional government to the United States of America, and the right of every person to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. |
| Events Calendar |
2008 Libertarian Party of Massachusetts State Convention Saturday, October 18 at 10:00 AM Tweed's Restaurant, Grove Street, Worcester
You may also post events related to Libertarianism and Massachusetts on the public Events forum. Note: Some events listed may not be affiliated with LPMA.
| News and Commentary |
Court rules that Libertarian Party nominees must be placed on Massachusetts ballot
Massachusetts Elections Division procedure for substitution of actual nominees for President and Vice President faulted
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
September 23, 2008
CONTACT:
Christopher Ott, Communications Manager, 617-482-3170, x322, cott@aclum.org
George Phillies, 508-754-1859, phillies@4liberty.net
BOSTON -- A federal judge has ordered the Secretary of the Commonwealth to list Bob Barr and Wayne A. Root as the Libertarian Party candidates for President and Vice-President on the November ballot. As a result of a suit brought by the American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts, Barr and Root, who were selected at the party's nominating convention, will be substituted for George Phillies and Chris Bennett, two unsuccessful candidates whose names appeared on the party's state nominating petitions.
The Libertarian Party does not currently qualify as a "political party" under Massachusetts law because it did not have a candidate who received three percent of the vote in the last statewide election. As a result, a candidate seeking to run as a Libertarian must collect valid signatures from at least 10,000 voters to secure a place on the ballot. When the party began to collect signatures earlier this year, Phillies and Bennett were listed as the party's candidates. In late May, however, the party nominated Barr and Root. At that point the party had collected over 7,000 signatures, but when party officials sought to have Barr and Root listed as the candidates, they were informed that the Secretary would not allow substitution and that they would have to start from scratch -- even though state law and prior practice allowed for substitution and the Secretary's Election Division had indicated that substitution would not be a problem.
The ACLU of Massachusetts, a nonpartisan civil liberties organization, filed suit last month on behalf of the candidates and the party, asserting that the procedures followed by the office of the Secretary were so vague as to violate their right to due process of law and that the selective allowance of substitution deprived them of equal protection of the law.
In an order entered late yesterday, Judge Nathaniel Gorton held that absence of any clear guidance in state law governing the process of substitution effectively required minor political parties, such as the Libertarian Party, to guess at their peril how to comply with the law. Finding that this placed a substantial burden on the party's access to the ballot which could not be justified by any discernible interest on the part of the state, and recognizing the harm that would result from deprivation of such access, the court granted the preliminary injunction sought by the plaintiffs.
"The central issue in this case is the restriction of ballot access for third parties, which has been and continues to be a problem in Massachusetts," said John Reinstein, Legal Director for the ACLU of Massachusetts.
"The right of political parties or candidates to a place on the ballot bears directly on the right of citizens to vote. If parties or candidates are kept off the ballot, their adherents are compelled to vote for representatives other than those of their choice," said Reinstein. "The denial of a place on the ballot thus constitutes a deprivation of the franchise."
In July 2007, Dr. George Phillies, the leading Massachusetts candidate of the Libertarian Party, wrote to the Massachusetts Elections Division to explain that he foresaw a potential problem: required signature gathering for placement on the Massachusetts ballot needed to begin before the national Libertarian Party's nominating convention on May 25, 2008. Phillies asked about the possibility of substituting the name of the final Libertarian Party candidate on the ballot if the nominee selected at the party's convention differed from the one submitted at the time of the signature-gathering deadline.
The Massachusetts Election Division responded:
"If the Libertarian Party seeks to substitute a candidate for President who they already got signatures for on nominating papers, our Office can prepare a form that allows members of the party to request the substitution of the candidate."
At the national Libertarian Party's nominating convention on May 25, 2008, the party selected former U.S. Congressman Bob Barr as its nominee for president, and Wayne A. Root as its vice presidential nominee. Dr. Phillies, who finished fifth, re-contacted the Massachusetts Elections Division to inform them of the need for substitution. On June 5, 2008, the Division denied this request, stating that the party would need to repeat the process of signature gathering to place new names on the ballot.
"Requiring smaller political parties to re-gather signatures for their final nominees is a significant and burdensome expense and thus serves as a barrier to their full participation in the electoral process," said Carol Rose, Executive Director of the ACLU of Massachusetts. "The Commonwealth should do everything it can to encourage greater electoral participation, not blocking access to the ballot or allowing voters to be misled or confused about who they are actually voting for."
The plaintiffs in the suit were represented by ACLU of Massachusetts cooperating attorneys Matthew Baltay, Amrish Wadhera and Jennifer Behr at the firm of Foley Hoag LLP, and by John Reinstein, Legal Director of the ACLU of Massachusetts.
For more information:
http://www.aclum.org
http://www.aclum.org/legal/barr_v_galvin/pi_order.pdf
http://www.aclum.org/legal/barr_v_galvin/barr_memorandum_and_order_granting_pi.pdf
Our November Candidates
Bob Barr, Libertarian Party Candidate for U.S. President
Wayne Allen "WAR" Root, Libertarian Pary Candidate for U.S. Vice President
Robert J. Underwood of Springfield, Libertarian Party Candidate for U. S. Senator
List of Libertarian Candidates in the U.S.A
Referendum to decriminalize small amounts of marijuana and save millions of dollars
On November 4, 2008, Massachusetts voters will have the chance to pass a ballot initiative decriminalizing the possession of small amounts of marijuana — removing the threat of jail time for possessing an ounce or less of marijuana for personal use. This initiative would save the commonwealth millions of dollars in law enforcement resources each year. You can provide support to The Committee for Sensible Marijuana Policy, who are organizing this referendum question, through their website.
Referendum to End the State Income Tax in Massachusetts
The Small Government Act to End the Income Tax is a Massachusetts statewide ballot question that will be "Question 1" on the general election ballot in November 2008.If a simple majority, i.e., if 50%+ of voters say "YES" to Question 1 on November 4th, the Small Government Act to End the Income Tax will become law. We will end the Massachusetts state income tax.
The new law will go into effect immediately when election results are official, and will affect taxpayers starting January 1, 2009.
The Small Government Act to End the Income Tax is a binding referendum, not a constitutional amendment nor an advisory question. It's a statute, just like any law passed by the legislature. If a majority of voters say "Yes", it will be encoded in the Massachusetts General Law, the body of law for the state government, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
If we END the Income Tax in Massachusetts:
- Your family will save an average of $3,700 for each taxpayer in your family. Money you'll be able to keep, to spend on your family, your retirement, for you favorite charity - in your own community.
- You will no longer pay the 5.3% income tax on wages.
- If you're living on an annuity, you will no longer pay the 5.3% income tax on interest or dividends than you need to make ends meet.
- If you sell your house, your business, or your stock, you will no longer pay 5.3-12% interest on capital gains.
- Best of all, there will be $12 billion less that the state government can waste, misspend, hand out in pork-barrel projects, or use for Big Government Programs that fail and that make things worse.
Voting Information
Here is how to find out where to vote,
and who will be on your local ballot
http://www.wheredoivotema.com/bal/myelectioninfo.php
| Make a Donation! |
Make a donation directly to the State Party.
We are required to ask for your occupation and employer if your contribution or total amount pledged exceeds $200.00
Make a donation to the National Party.
Free Gift for Every Donor to LPMASS
| Join Us! |
- Get a Libertarian Party of Massachusetts membership form (to print and mail in)!
- Let us know how you want to volunteer.
|
Libertarian Party of Massachusetts P.O. Box 1154 Worcester MA 01613-1154 |
| Chair - George Phillies Telephone: 508-754-1859 Email: phillies@4liberty.net |
| Why we changed URLs, and can you help us? |
